Should I use real-world locations or fictional locations for specific places?

Question: I'm writing a contemporary romance novel, and I wonder if I should use real locations or fictional locations when it comes to very specific places like the street the protagonists live.


I've read books that use very specific locations that you could google it and find out where it exactly is.

Meanwhile, there are some other books that take place in a specific city but use fictional neighborhoods; however, the most famous places that represents that city still exist in the books. For example, if a story takes place in New York, the protagonists might live in an apartment that doesn't really exist, however, the fifth avenue, wall street, and other places that are symbolic for New York are still mentioned in the book.

I'm not living in the location where my story takes place, so I think it will be easier for me to create a fictional neighborhood, but I want to know which one is better.

Answer: It's not about which approach is better or worse. Each has advantages and disadvantages and you are free to choose.

Sometimes a specific setting is extremely important in a story. The character of the place, its culture, history, and icons may be important in terms of their symbolism or role in the plot. Shedding a light on a particular place that few people know about may be a
key reason you are writing the book.

On the other hand, many successful romances seem to take place in generic towns or cities that are practically interchangeable.

You have do decide as a writer whether you are writing a romance that just happens to take place in New York, or a story about New York that just happens to involve a romance. It's your choice where to put the emphasis.

Creating a fictional location within an otherwise real setting is a useful approach that gives you the best of both worlds. You have the freedom to design your setting to suit your plot. It also avoids causing problems for anyone who happens to live at an actual address mentioned in your story.

At the same time, some genuine landmarks give authenticity to your story and let the reader have the vicarious experience of learning about a place they may never have visited.

Again, you have to weigh the advantages and disadvantages. There's no answer that's right for every story.

Ask yourself what interests you in writing this story. Is it the characters, the place, the subject matter, the plot twists, etc.? Strive for authenticity in the areas that most interest you.

One final tip: if you are writing a category romance, you should check on the publishers' websites to see if setting is an important feature within that category.

Comments for Should I use real-world locations or fictional locations for specific places?

Click here to add your own comments

Apr 16, 2016
using a real place
by: Phil Birch

When I was a kid I read a book based in Manchester (England) set on a fictitious street in my neighbourhood. It was obvious that the author knew the area. This enhanced my experience considerably. Now nearly fifty years later I have just finished a story set in a fictional building in Manchester. I feel that the locations, real streets, real buildings, real pubs and businesses and in some cases real people add a certain realism to the story. These can all be googled. I am using a slightly more international setting in my second book, but these are all places I have visited. It is easier to describe the atmosphere of a place if it is real and you have had first hand experience of it. I read a first novel by a writer which was set in the US. It was painfully obvious that he's never been there. All the descriptions of places were from other books and movies. I was overwhelmed by a sense of deja vu at times. Keep it completely real or totally fictional. Of course as said elsewhere, don't use real addresses!

Click here to add your own comments

Join in and submit your own question/topic! It's easy to do. How? Simply click here to return to Questions About Novel Writing.